|About this Recording
8.557056 - BRAHMS, J.: Four-Hand Piano Music, Vol. 10 (Matthies, Köhn)
Johannes Brahms (1833-1897): Four Hand Piano Music, Volume 10
String Quartets, Op. 51 Nos. 1 & 2
Johannes Brahms was born in Hamburg in 1833, the son of a double-bass player and his much older wife, a seamstress. His childhood was spent in relative poverty, and his early studies in music, for which he showed a natural aptitude, developed his talent to such an extent that there was talk of touring as a prodigy at the age of eleven. It was Eduard Marxsen who gave him a grounding in the technical basis of composition, while the boy helped his family by playing the piano in summer inns.
In 1851 Brahms met the émigré Hungarian violinist Reményi, who introduced him to Hungarian dance music that had a later influence on his work. Two years later he set out in his company on his first concert tour, their journey taking them, on the recommendation of the Hungarian violinist Joachim, to Weimar, where Franz Liszt held court and might have been expected to show particular favour to a fellow-countryman. Reményi profited from the visit, but Brahms, with a lack of tact that was later accentuated, failed to impress the Master. Later in the year, however, he met the Schumanns, through Joachim’s agency. The meeting was a fruitful one.
In 1850 Schumann had taken up the offer from the previous incumbent, Ferdinand Hiller, of the position of municipal director of music in Düsseldorf, the first official appointment of his career and the last. Now in the music of Brahms he detected a promise of greatness and published his views in the journal he had once edited, the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik, declaring Brahms the long-awaited successor to Beethoven. In the following year Schumann, who had long suffered from intermittent periods of intense depression, attempted suicide. His final years, until his death in 1856, were to be spent in an asylum, while Brahms rallied to the support of Schumann’s wife, the gifted pianist Clara Schumann, and her young family, remaining a firm friend until her death in 1896, shortly before his own in the following year.
Brahms had always hoped that sooner or later he would be able to return in triumph to a position of distinction in the musical life of Hamburg. This ambition was never fulfilled. Instead he settled in Vienna, intermittently from 1863 and definitively in 1869, establishing himself there and seeming to many to fulfil Schumann’s early prophecy. In him his supporters, including, above all, the distinguished critic and writer Eduard Hanslick, saw a true successor to Beethoven and a champion of music untrammelled by extra-musical associations, of pure music, as opposed to the Music of the Future promoted by Wagner and Liszt, a path to which Joachim and Brahms both later publicly expressed their opposition.
Brahms made a significant contribution to chamber music repertoire. His first string quartet, the String Quartet in C minor, Opus 51, No. 1, was written between 1868 and 1873, and is more or less contemporary with String Quartet in A minor, Opus 51, No. 2, completed in the same year. As with much of his work, the quartets represent some years of earlier experiment. Brahms claims to have destroyed a score of attempts at the form, some of which seem to have reached playable form, before their destruction or recomposition. In 1869 he had rejected offers of teaching positions in Cologne and in Berlin, offered by Ferdinand Hiller and by Joachim respectively, in the hope of an appointment in Vienna, where he settled definitively in that year. It was not until 1872 that he was offered and accepted the position of conductor and artistic adviser of the Vienna Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde concerts, a position he held for three seasons.
Once Brahms had settled in Vienna, he followed the custom of spending summer holidays in the country, periods when he was able to devote himself to composition with relatively little interruption. In 1873 he spent the summer at Tutzing, near Munich, and it was here that he completed the first two string quartets that he thought fit for publication, Opus 51, dedicating them to the distinguished surgeon and musical amateur Theodor Billroth, whom he had first met during a summer holiday near Zurich in 1866. Brahms seems to have worked on the demanding musical form for some years and it would seem that he had drafted preliminary versions of the quartets during the years immediately preceding their completion, always conscious of the tradition that lay behind the genre. Brahms’s two quartets had their first performance in the year of their completion, given by the Joachim Quartet, a recent misunderstanding with Joachim over the failure to include the German Requiem in the Schumann Festival in Bonn that autumn now more or less forgotten. Both quartets were arranged for piano, four hands, in common with other chamber music by Brahms.
The String Quartet No. 1 in C minor, Opus 51, No. 1, opens with an Allegro in which the first theme is presented over repeated notes in accompaniment in a lower register, imparting an immediate element of tension. The first subject continues in a remoter key, before the return of the theme, leading eventually to the lyrical second subject. The exposition, which is repeated, ends with a version of the opening figure in the bass and it is the first subject that finds an important place in the central development section, with its modulation to C sharp minor, before the original key and first subject return in recapitulation. The A flat major second movement, with the title Romanze, offers an opening theme over a figure suggesting a horn-call, followed by a section of secondary material. The process is repeated, with the first theme now varied, followed by a version of the secondary material, now in the home key. The F minor third movement is a very Brahmsian form of scherzo, characterized by the descending contours of its melodic line and contrasted with a trio section in F major. Both middle movements had included thematic reference to the principal theme of the first movement. The same is true of the final Allegro, broadly in tripartite sonata-form, although it lacks the clearer sectional division of the first movement, seeming to absorb the expected central development into the recapitulation. Like the rest of the quartet it is symphonic and orchestral in conception and characteristically dense in its textures, and remains remarkably effective in its piano version.
The first movement of the String Quartet in A minor, the second of the pair, is in impeccable sonata-allegro form. The connection with Joseph Joachim, who had long urged Brahms to provide him with quartets, is established in the use of the cryptic motif F-A-E (frei aber einsam), Joachim’s motto, used twenty years before in a composite violin sonata, with Schumann and their friend Dietrich. Brahms adapted Joachim’s motto into his own F-A-F (frei aber froh) motif and this appears later in the movement. The second subject has about it some of the lyrical quality of Schubert and there is a relatively short development and more or less literal recapitulation, the movement ending in the composer’s favourite device of cross-rhythms. The A major Andante moderato offers a dark-coloured principal theme, first heard over a lower counterpoint. There is an excursion into the relative minor key, with violin and cello in canon, and a return to the principal theme, now in the key of F, before matters are brought to rights and the tonality of A re-established. In the third movement Brahms offers an original substitute for a scherzo, with an interlocking major key trio that changes pace and mode, moving from A minor to A major, now marked Allegretto vivace. The mood returns to one of gentle melancholy in A minor with the re-appearance of the Tempo di Minuetto. The quartet ends with a movement that suggests more overtly the Hungarian element hinted in the preceding Quasi Minuetto, a compliment to the Hungarian émigré Joachim. The form is in general that of the classical sonata-allegro, its related thematic material transformed in a texture that allows indulgence in cross-rhythms with all the dramatic intensity that Brahms had at his command, and finds a place, as elsewhere in each of the movements, for the device of canon, a contrapuntal element for which Joachim too had a fondness.
Close the window