Classical Music Home

The World's Leading Classical Music Group

Email Password  
Not a subscriber yet?
Keyword Search
in
 
 Classical Music Home > Naxos Album Reviews

Album Reviews



 
See latest reviews of other albums...

Jonathan Woolf
MusicWeb International, July 2005

"The question here is transfer quality. These are such well known and admired traversals that commentary is pretty much redundant and Primrose admirers tend to concentrate on the superiority or otherwise of the Goehr, pre-War London Casadesus/Handel or this American 1946 remake, and the various recordings Primrose left of the Walton and Berlioz. All are pretty much self-recommending whatever your particular preference, notwithstanding the changing timbral nature of Primrose’s tone - its greater, tensile Heifetzian quality and faster vibrato in the post-War years.

To business then. Is it this Mark Obert-Thorn transfer of the Casadesus/Handel the preferred one or the Rick Torres for Biddulph? You can find the Torres transfer on LAB146 devoted to the great violist’s recordings and you will find that it is palpably inferior to this Naxos. The new release has greater body, immediacy and definition and catches Primrose’s tone with greater fidelity. As for the Walton I can only compare this latest transfer with the last EMI LP pressing, on Treasury EH2912761. Naxos certainly preserves more surface noise but, pound for pound, shilling for shilling, the Naxos edges it by virtue of its greater presence, without any artificial spotlighting.

There’s a difference in transfer philosophies when it comes to the Berlioz. The leading contender is Dutton CDEA 5013 in which Mike Dutton used the 78s to transfer. But Mark Obert-Thorn has gone for a transfer from LPs with their wider dynamic range. It’s a move that has paid off in this instance. The Naxos sound is brighter, and captures far more of the frequencies enshrined in the recording. In fact the Dutton sounds positively subterranean next to the newcomer with congealed bass frequencies all too honestly retained and an amorphous sense of the Boston Symphony’s string section. With the Naxos you can very readily appreciate the string choir’s separation and the greater sense of aeration in their transfer. There’s also some scrunch in the Dutton that one doesn’t find with the Naxos.

Given the competition A/B listening hands the palm to Naxos. The release also inaugurates a new Great Violists series, which is very welcome. Primrose has been well covered in re-releases, though can someone please find evidence of his Fricker and Rubbra concerto performances? In the meantime can I hope that Naxos gets to grips with Lionel Tertis’ imperishable legacy. Biddulph has announced a set of his Columbia 78s but his earlier acoustic Vocalions have been shamefully treated over the years. It’s time for a recording engineer and a company with vision and commitment to get to work and restore that body of recordings to the living catalogue, where it belongs."



Christopher Howell
MusicWeb International, April 2005

"If it was Lionel Tertis (1876-1975) who put the viola on the map as a solo instrument, it was the Scotsman William Primrose (1904-1982) who established a more modern, brilliant style, gradually taking his distance from Tertis’s deeper tones. Modern listeners might have to “adjust” to Tertis, as they do to Kreisler or Szigeti, in order to appreciate them, but should have no such problems with Primrose, at least in Berlioz and Walton.

The Casadesus was actually believed to be real Handel when this recording was made, though with its delicate wind band in place of a continuo surely they must, even then, have realized that it had been, at the very least, thoroughly “doctored”? Under the circumstances one can hardly complain about an unauthentic approach – indeed, given its spurious romantic origin I suppose this is the authentic approach, though it might be amusing, one April Fool’s Day, to try it out with a dedicated original instruments band.

Tully Potter tells us in his notes that the conductor Frieder Weissmann is best remembered for marrying the soprano Meta Seinemeyer on her deathbed. On a slightly less “Trivial Pursuits” level, he was nearly the first conductor to record all the Beethoven Symphonies, but became, instead, the first of several – another was Joseph Keilberth – who recorded a “headless monster”: the first eight symphonies only. An immensely active recording artist before the war, he sank from view after it though his career lasted until at least 1960. Justly or not, he is now remembered only in relation to the famous artists he accompanied on disc.

The 1946 Walton recording was already the composer’s second, the first having been made with Frederick Riddle eight years earlier. Modern listeners, accustomed to hearing this concerto played rather more lushly and romantically, might find the present version a bit relentlessly brilliant. Walton himself tended to be suspicious of his own more romantic side and appears to be encouraging this approach, no doubt hoping to disguise the fact that even in this fairly early work the enfant terrible of Façade was acquiring middle-aged spread. Later, in well-upholstered old age, he took to conducting the piece rather more slowly. He had in any case, in 1961, considerably expanded the orchestration, so your best chance to hear the original leaner conception is the present recording, dated but reasonably clear. A further recording by Primrose, with the RPO under Sargent and coupled with Hindemith’s Die Schwanendreher under Pritchard, was issued in America by Columbia Odyssey and in Europe by Philips. It has been unavailable for at least two generations.

Primrose made three commercial recordings of Harold in Italy; the present version was followed by those under Beecham and Munch. To these must be added two live recordings under Toscanini. Conventional wisdom has it that the performance under Koussevitzky was the finest of the three “official” ones. I haven’t the Beecham to hand but quite frankly the differences with the Munch are so great as to render quite meaningless the concept of a “best” version. Munch’s Harold is bathed in the sort of softly glowing lights Berlioz’s countryman and near-contemporary Corot found in Italy; furthermore Munch’s climaxes have a euphoric blaze, a hedonistic splendour, which suggest a kinship between his own temperament and that of the composer. Koussevitzky’s tighter control but slower tempi mean that Harold is surrounded by louring mountains and threatening skies. The most notable difference is in the second movement (Koussevitzky: 08:49, Munch: 06:40). Koussevitzky’s pilgrims are a footsore if prayerful lot; Munch’s sound weary but at the same time joyful, movingly aware that their goal is at last in sight. In view of this, and some fidgety tempo changes in the first movement from Koussevitzky, I must say my own preference would be for Munch, which obviously benefits from 1958 stereo, though if it’s DDD sound you’re after you will obviously want something much more recent still (the latest version under Sir Colin Davis, for example). That said, the Koussevitzky sounds remarkably good for its age and of course his alternative view is worth having.

A useful compilation of recordings by the first great modern violist."






Famous Composers Quick Link:
Bach | Beethoven | Chopin | Dowland | Handel | Haydn | Mozart | Glazunov | Schumann | R Strauss | Vivaldi
4:11:27 PM, 30 July 2014
All Naxos Historical, Naxos Classical Archives, Naxos Jazz, Folk and Rock Legends and Naxos Nostalgia titles are not available in the United States and some titles may not be available in Australia and Singapore because these countries have copyright laws that provide or may provide for terms of protection for sound recordings that differ from the rest of the world.
Copyright © 2014 Naxos Digital Services Ltd. All rights reserved.     Terms of Use     Privacy Policy
-212-
Classical Music Home
NOTICE: This site was unavailable for several hours on Saturday, June 25th 2011 due to some unexpected but essential maintenance work. We apologize for any inconvenience.