|About this Recording
8.572280 - WEINBERG, M.: Cello Music (Complete), Vol. 1 (Feigelson) - 24 Preludes / Cello Solo Sonata No. 1
Mieczysław Weinberg (1919–1996):
Travelling through the vast Soviet Union in the late 1970s as a soloist of the Moscow State Concert Agency, I often visited small-town book-stores which frequently also sold sheet music. Many times the music that was sold quickly in the major cities was accidentally found in these provincial town stores. I think it was in the town of Chita in southern Siberia, where I came across a score that read 24 Preludes for Unaccompanied Cello, Op. 100. Who might be such a brave writer, I immediately thought, who could take the cello on such a long journey alone, solo, akin to compositions for the omnipotent piano? The name sounded familiar: Moissei Weinberg—a well respected composer and close associate of Dim Dimich (as Dmitry Dmitrievich Shostakovich was often referred to by musicians). I had heard some music of Weinberg’s before, but it was usually his folksy Moldavian Rhapsody or the very effective and flashy Trumpet Concerto. I admit being then, like most of my generation, a bit cynical about somebody writing in a so called, “official style”. However, I thought, whatever these compositions might be, I could probably use some solo preludes in my future recitals.
Unexpectedly, the opportunity came quite soon. Early in 1980, my family decided to leave for the West. While waiting for official permission to emigrate, I still had a few concerts left to play including a prestigious Moscow recital. One problem though: no pianist wanted to play with me as I was a political outcast about to leave the country. Still, I was determined to use this last chance to perform and decided to play alone. Scrambling for repertoire, I came across the Weinberg score and chose seven of the preludes that seemed most interesting. The next opportunity arose only eight years later when I had played five preludes at New York’s 92nd street Y as part of my American recital début.
By this time, the extraordinary magnitude and importance of the Preludes, Op. 100 had become apparent to me. Through friends, I found the composer’s phone number in Moscow and spent a good deal of time (and money) speaking to him; by this time, he was a gravely ill man, tied to his bed for several of his last years. There was so much I wanted to know, including why had not my legendary teacher, Mstislav Rostropovich, ever performed Weinberg’s Preludes, as they were specifically written for him in 1969? Moreover, the 24 Preludes, published in 1975, obviously had Rostropovich’s bowings and fingerings without his name even mentioned. But of course, by this time the cellist was already in exile in the United States. Weinberg never clearly answered my question, citing only that “Slava was the one who suggested that I compose the solo preludes, but later became too busy and forgot about me and my music altogether”. Rostropovich was not forthcoming himself, when in the early 1990s, he reacted to my question only with a quick reply: “He (Weinberg) was a coward…” I did not ask any further. Of course it meant that Weinberg, who lost his family to the Holocaust and experienced Stalin’s imprisonment, had not been supportive of Slava’s involvement with Alexander Solzhenitsin, the renowned Soviet dissident and author of Gulag Archipelago. In fact, I doubt that Weinberg had even tried to remind Rostropovich about his work during these unsettled times. So this unique music never sounded from the hands of the greatest living cellist to whom it was dedicated. The honour and responsibility became mine with a reasonably quiet world première in Tallinn, Estonia, in 1995 and a well publicized United States première in New York City in 1996.
There are so many angles from which one could look at the 24 Preludes for Solo Cello, Op. 100. The work might be compared to a series of extremely varied, masterful drawings unified by a deep philosophical idea. I would describe this as “The Essence of Life”. In his approach Weinberg was clearly inspired by Bach’s famous Well-tempered Clavier, as well as Chopin’s and Shostakovitch’s piano preludes. His general progression is akin to Bach’s as the Preludes ascend from the key of C and descend back through all twelve notes, while freely mixing major and minor keys and elements of atonal writing. Bach’s influence is further reinforced by two of the preludes written in the Sarabande or Menuet form. In his quest, the composer exhibits a truly limitless amount of imagination and shows remarkable ability to write for the cello in a myriad of different ways.
Prelude No. 1 starts with the rich sound of an open C string, going into a chain of octaves and other intervals. It sounds very forceful, primitive and chaotic. This “Chaos of the Beginning” makes me think of the Book of Genesis in the Bible. No. 2 is still purposely primitive and slightly folksy. No. 3 introduces the effect of a simple two-voice conversation; No. 4 blends elements of the beginning into a more coherent, singing line. In No. 5 Weinberg uses a very effective “collage” of themes from Robert Schumann’s and his close friend Boris Tchaikovsky’s cello concertos. The Sixth Prelude is reminiscent of a typical Russian folk-song whereas No. 7 has an eerie perpetual motion with a passing Russian-Orthodox chorale. No. 8 recalls Prokofiev’s March from The Love for Three Oranges.
The Preludes form several “waves” with well planned troughs and peaks. The second such wave starts in Prelude No. 9, using the octave elements of No. 1 with a rather well concentrated and renewed force. It continues right into the extremely powerful “machine”-like motion of No. 10. Both No. 9 and No. 10 embody well-pronounced Russian melodic and rhythmic features, creating vivid images of immense turbulence and suffering. In contrast, the weak and breathless No. 11 is followed by the very soft and song-like No. 12. Mystical and exploratory, Nos. 13 and 14 lead to a finely developed, if still understated, fugue (No. 15). No. 16 explodes into an extremely dramatic Jewish dance—the clear centrepiece of the entire work.
The third “wave” starts immediately with No. 17, at first further reinforcing elements of the beginning, then, suddenly, becoming very weak and unsure. Highly emotional and personal, the Sarabande of No. 18, and the “mechanically-broken” No. 19, are followed by a rather strange and enigmatic No. 20. No. 21 is related to the music of Shostakovich, Weinberg’s most dedicated friend. Two famous themes, one—like an eternal question—from the First Cello Concerto, another—playful and innocent—from the finale of the Cello Sonata, are magically intertwined here. The subdued and oriental (Indian?)–sounding No. 22 and the “shocking” atonal writing in No. 23 lead the Preludes to a peaceful, if somewhat unresolved, conclusion with the graceful Menuet of No. 24. Weinberg ends everything with the same, enveloping, low and rich cello C that began the work.
Greatly inspired by the Preludes, I quickly found and fell in love with Weinberg’s Sonata for Solo Cello No. 1, Op. 72. Written for Mstislav Rostropovich in 1960, it received its official première the same year in Moscow and was published in 1963. The work consists of three contrasting movements. The first is an Adagio with a very Russian-sounding, epic and broad main theme which develops into the emotional climax of the middle section and then returns back to a calm state. Second, we have an Allegretto with the wonderful, surreal charm of a Mahler Landler-like movement. Masterfully written, the Finale is full of energy and drama. Elements of the “hits” and “runs” (strongly accented and separated octaves, followed by fast passages) are dominant here. Using vivid Jewish melodies and rhythms, Weinberg concludes the sonata with a powerful and remarkably effective coda.
Close the window